β‘ THE UNITED STATES OPERATES AS A ROGUE STATE β A NATION THAT CLAIMS THE BENEFITS OF INTERNATIONAL LAW WHILE REFUSING TO BE BOUND BY ITS OBLIGATIONS.
The U.S. legal system is not a system of justice. It is a system of power β designed to protect the interests of those who created it, not to uphold universal principles of right and wrong.
The “rule of law” in the United States is a myth. The real rule is:
“usa make the rules. usa enforce the rules. And usa change the rules when they don’t serve usa.”
THE GENOCIDE OF AMERICA
Using the colonial name they call it “America”, AND THE CREATION OF A NATION BUILT ON STOLEN LAND AND SLAVERY
The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969) states that a treaty is void if procured by the threat or use of force. In addition Jus Cogens (Peremptory Norms) β norms so fundamental that no treaty can violate them. The prohibition on genocide, slavery, racial discrimination, and aggression are jus cogens. Key Point: The International Law Commission has confirmed that jus cogens norms can have retroactive effect.
βοΈ U.S. Constitution: 1787
βοΈ 13th Amendment: 1865
β‘ CRITICAL POINT:
The United States was founded on the Doctrine of Discovery β a series of Papal Bulls (1452-1493) that declared European Christians had the right to claim lands inhabited by non-Christians. Indigenous peoples were never consulted.
The U.S. Supreme Court adopted the Doctrine of Discovery in Johnson v. McIntosh (1823), declaring that Indigenous peoples only had “right of occupancy,” not full title to their lands. This was NOT a treaty. It was a unilateral imposition by a foreign power’s religious decree.
Key Legal Facts:
1. The Doctrine of Discovery was a religious fiction β never agreed to by Indigenous peoples.
2. The U.S. Constitution explicitly protected slavery (Three-Fifths Compromise, Slave Trade Clause, Fugitive Slave Clause).
3. Enslaved Africans were defined as property β never consulted, never consented.
4. The 13th Amendment (1865) abolished slavery with an exception for “punishment for crime” β creating the convict leasing system, a continuation of slavery by another name.
5. Indigenous nations and enslaved Africans were never parties to any treaty or compact establishing the United States.
6. Under international law, crimes against humanity have no statute of limitations. The “standing” objection is a domestic procedural bar that cannot override jus cogens norms.
THE GENOCIDE OF INDIGENOUS PEOPLES AND THE ENSLAVEMENT OF AFRICANS
The United States did not acquire its territory through peaceful negotiation or mutual consent. The Doctrine of Discovery was merely a religious pretextβa legal fiction used to justify a campaign of genocide, dispossession, and enslavement that continues to this day. Critically, no Indigenous nation ever consented to U.S. sovereignty over their lands. No African ever consented to their enslavement. The U.S. employed violence and military might to defeat opposition to their take-over of native lands and to maintain the institution of slavery. Bloodshed and widespread destruction resulted from the final overthrow of indigenous political authorities and the brutal enforcement of the slave system.
The Pequot Massacre (1637)
The Pequot Massacre was one of the first genocidal acts against Indigenous peoples in what would become the United States. English settlers, with the help of Indigenous allies, attacked a Pequot village at Mystic, Connecticut.
Approximately 500-700 Pequot men, women, and children were burned alive or killed as they tried to escape the flames. The English commander, Captain John Mason, wrote: “God laughed his enemies and the enemies of his people to scorn, making them as a fiery oven… Thus did the Lord judge the heathen.” Survivors were sold into slavery in the Caribbean.
The Massachusetts Bay Colony declared a “Day of Thanksgiving” for the massacre. This was not a war. It was genocide.
King Philip’s War (1675-1678)
King Philip’s War was one of the bloodiest conflicts in American history relative to population. English colonists and their allies fought against a coalition of Indigenous nations led by Metacom (King Philip) of the Wampanoag.
Approximately 3,000 Indigenous people were killed β a devastating percentage of the Indigenous population. Thousands more were sold into slavery in the Caribbean and Europe. The war effectively ended Indigenous resistance in southern New England.
Metacom was captured, beheaded, and his head was displayed on a pike in Plymouth for 25 years. His wife and son were sold into slavery.
The Trail of Tears: The Forced Removal of the Five Civilized Tribes (1830-1850)
The Indian Removal Act of 1830, signed by President Andrew Jackson, authorized the forced removal of Indigenous nations from their ancestral lands east of the Mississippi River. The Cherokee, Choctaw, Chickasaw, Creek, and Seminole nations β known as the “Five Civilized Tribes” β were forcibly marched to present-day Oklahoma.
Approximately 100,000 Indigenous people were displaced. An estimated 15,000-20,000 died along the way from disease, starvation, and exposure. The Cherokee Nation had successfully sued the state of Georgia in the Supreme Court (Worcester v. Georgia, 1832), and the Court ruled that the Cherokee had sovereignty. President Jackson famously responded: “John Marshall has made his decision; now let him enforce it.” He ignored the ruling and proceeded with removal.
The Trail of Tears was not a treaty. It was ethnic cleansing. The Cherokee never consented.
The Sand Creek Massacre (1864)
On November 29, 1864, Colonel John Chivington led a U.S. Army attack on a peaceful Cheyenne and Arapaho village at Sand Creek, Colorado Territory. The village had been promised protection by the U.S. government and was flying an American flag and a white flag of surrender.
Approximately 150-200 Cheyenne and Arapaho were killed β mostly women, children, and elderly. Soldiers mutilated the bodies, scalping and dismembering them. Chivington later bragged that his troops had “killed 500 Indians” and that “nits make lice” β justifying the murder of children.
A subsequent military investigation condemned the massacre, but no one was ever punished. Chivington was never held accountable.
The Wounded Knee Massacre (1890)
The Wounded Knee Massacre was the final act of the Indian Wars. On December 29, 1890, the U.S. 7th Cavalry surrounded a group of Lakota (Sioux) at Wounded Knee Creek, South Dakota.
Approximately 250-300 Lakota men, women, and children were killed β 150 of whom were women and children. The cavalry used Hotchkiss guns (rapid-fire cannons) to cut down the fleeing Lakota. 25 U.S. soldiers were killed, mostly by friendly fire.
The massacre ended the Indian Wars. The Lakota were defeated. The U.S. government awarded 20 Medals of Honor to the soldiers who participated in the massacre. To this day, the medals have never been revoked.
The California Indian Genocide (1846-1873)
The California Gold Rush triggered one of the worst genocides in American history. Between 1846 and 1873, approximately 100,000-150,000 California Indians were killed β a 90% reduction in the Indigenous population of California.
The causes included:
– Systematic massacres by militias and vigilantes
– Forced labor and enslavement (California legalized Indigenous enslavement in 1850)
– Disease (introduced by settlers)
– Starvation (as lands were taken and food sources destroyed)
– Government-sanctioned bounty programs (the state paid bounties for Indian scalps)
The California state government offered bounties of $5 to $25 for Indian scalps β a literal price on the heads of Indigenous people. This was state-sponsored genocide.
The Navajo Long Walk (1864)
In 1864, the U.S. Army forced the Navajo people to walk 300 miles from their homeland in Arizona to a reservation at Bosque Redondo in New Mexico. The journey, known as the “Long Walk,” was brutal.
Approximately 9,000 Navajo were forced to march. Over 200 died along the way from disease, starvation, and cold. At the reservation, conditions were terrible β the land was barren, the water was bad, and disease was rampant. Thousands more died during their four-year imprisonment.
The Navajo were finally allowed to return to their homeland in 1868, but they had lost their sovereignty and much of their land. They had never consented to removal.
The Native American Boarding School System (1870s-1960s)
The U.S. government established a system of over 400 boarding schools for Indigenous children across the United States. The stated goal was to “kill the Indian, save the man.”
Children were forcibly taken from their families β often at gunpoint β and sent to distant schools where they were:
– Forbidden to speak their languages (beaten if they did)
– Forced to adopt Christian names and beliefs
– Subjected to physical, sexual, and psychological abuse
– Given inadequate food, clothing, and medical care
– Thousands died from disease, abuse, and neglect
The schools were deliberately designed to destroy Indigenous cultures and identities. This was cultural genocide. The last boarding school did not close until 1978.
The U.S. Constitution: A Compact of White Supremacy
The U.S. Constitution β the foundational legal document of the United States β explicitly protected slavery and excluded Indigenous peoples. Let us document each clause:
| Constitutional Clause | Text | What It Did |
|---|---|---|
| Article I, Section 2, Clause 3 (Three-Fifths Compromise) | “Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned… according to their respective Numbers, which shall be determined by adding to the whole Number of free Persons, including those bound to Service for a Term of Years, and excluding Indians not taxed, three fifths of all other Persons.” | Counted enslaved people as 3/5 of a person for representation β giving slave states more political power. Enslaved people were “other Persons.” |
| Article I, Section 9, Clause 1 (Slave Trade Clause) | “The Migration or Importation of such Persons as any of the States now existing shall think proper to admit, shall not be prohibited by the Congress prior to the Year one thousand eight hundred and eight.” | Prohibited Congress from banning the slave trade until 1808 β explicitly protecting the slave trade for 20 years. “Such Persons” was a euphemism for enslaved Africans. |
| Article IV, Section 2, Clause 3 (Fugitive Slave Clause) | “No Person held to Service or Labour in one State, under the Laws thereof, escaping into another, shall… be discharged from such Service or Labour, but shall be delivered up on Claim of the Party to whom such Service or Labour may be due.” | Required that enslaved people who escaped to free states be returned to their enslavers β making the federal government complicit in enforcing slavery. “Person held to Service” was a euphemism for enslaved people. |
| Article V (Amendment Protection) | Protected the slave trade clause from amendment until 1808 | Made slavery a constitutionally protected institution that could not be changed. |
The 13th Amendment: Freedom with a Catch
The 13th Amendment (1865) abolished slavery β but with a critical exception:
“Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.”
The exception was immediately exploited to create the convict leasing system β where formerly enslaved people were arrested for minor offenses, leased to plantations and factories, and forced to work without pay.
| Aspect | Details |
|---|---|
| Time Period | 1865-1920s |
| What Happened | Southern states arrested Black people for minor offenses (vagrancy, loitering, “disorderly conduct”) and leased them to plantations, railroad companies, and factories. |
| Conditions | Brutal; many died. It was slavery in all but name. |
| Economic Impact | The state profited; plantation owners got free labor; it replaced the slave economy after the Civil War. |
The Doctrine of Discovery: The Fictional Legal Foundation
The legal foundation for European colonization of Turtle Island was not a treaty with Indigenous peoples. It was a series of unilateral religious decrees issued by the Catholic Church β the Doctrine of Discovery.
| Papal Bull | Year | What It Declared |
|---|---|---|
| Romanus Pontifex | 1455 | Authorized European Christian nations to “subdue and bring to the faith” non-Christian peoples, and to “take possession” of their lands. |
| Inter Caetera | 1493 | Granted Spain the right to claim lands discovered in the Americas, declaring that “barbarous nations” could be “subjugated” and “brought to the faith.” |
| Dum Diversas | 1452 | Authorized the enslavement of “Saracens” and “other enemies of Christ” β later used to justify the enslavement of Africans and Indigenous peoples. |
The U.S. Supreme Court explicitly adopted the Doctrine of Discovery in Johnson v. McIntosh (1823). Chief Justice John Marshall wrote:
“The tribes of Indians inhabiting this country were fierce savages, whose occupation was war, and whose subsistence was drawn chiefly from the forest. To leave them in possession of their country was to leave the country a wilderness… The principle of discovery gave European nations an exclusive right to extinguish the Indian title of occupancy, either by purchase or by conquest.”
The Doctrine of Discovery was not a treaty. It was a justification for theft.
The Broken Treaties
The United States signed over 370 treaties with Indigenous nations between 1778 and 1871. The vast majority were broken by the U.S. government.
| Treaty | Year | What Was Promised | What Happened |
|---|---|---|---|
| Treaty of Fort Laramie | 1868 | Promised the Black Hills to the Lakota people “forever.” | The U.S. broke the treaty after gold was discovered. The Black Hills were taken. The Supreme Court later ruled (1980) that the U.S. had illegally taken the land and owed the Sioux $106 million β but the Sioux refused the money, demanding the land back. |
| Treaty of Hopewell | 1785 | Promised the Cherokee nation their land and sovereignty. | The U.S. broke the treaty and forced the Cherokee to cede more land. |
| Treaty of New Echota | 1835 | A small faction of Cherokee signed a treaty ceding all Cherokee land in the Southeast. | The treaty was signed without the consent of the Cherokee Nation’s elected leaders. The U.S. used it to justify the Trail of Tears. |
| The Fort Laramie Treaty | 1851 | Promised Indigenous nations their territories in the Great Plains. | The U.S. broke the treaty, opened the land to settlers, and launched wars against the Indigenous nations who resisted. |
π KEY POINT: THE FOUNDATION WAS BUILT ON BLOOD
The United States was not founded on consent. It was founded on genocide, slavery, and the systematic denial of consent. The Constitution was a compact of white supremacy that explicitly protected slavery. Indigenous nations were never consulted. Enslaved Africans were never consulted. Women were never consulted. The poor were never consulted. All of this was done to enforce a legal fiction β the Doctrine of Discovery β that was never agreed to by the peoples whose land was taken.
π SUMMARY OF DOCUMENTED CASUALTIES
- Pequot Massacre (1637): 500-700 Pequot killed, survivors enslaved.
- King Philip’s War (1675-1678): ~3,000 Indigenous killed, thousands enslaved.
- Trail of Tears (1830-1850): 15,000-20,000 Indigenous died during forced removal.
- Sand Creek Massacre (1864): 150-200 Cheyenne and Arapaho killed, mostly women and children.
- Wounded Knee Massacre (1890): 250-300 Lakota killed, 150 women and children.
- California Indian Genocide (1846-1873): 100,000-150,000 Indigenous killed β 90% population reduction.
- Navajo Long Walk (1864): 9,000 forced to march; over 200 died en route; thousands more died in captivity.
- Boarding School System (1870s-1960s): Thousands of Indigenous children died from abuse, disease, and neglect.
- Middle Passage: 12.5 million Africans forcibly taken to the Americas; ~597,000 to the U.S.
- Enslaved Population at Civil War (1860): ~4 million enslaved Africans in the U.S.
- Convict Leasing System (1865-1920s): Thousands of Black people forced into slavery-like labor.
Note: The U.S. government deliberately did not record “native” casualties, considering European lives more valuable. The actual death toll is likely significantly higher than documented figures.
MEMORANDUM OF ARGUMENT
ON BEHALF OF THE PLAINTIFFS
IN THE MATTER OF: The Claim of the Indigenous Nations of Turtle Island (the land now known as the United States of America) and the Descendants of Enslaved Africans against The United States of America, The Congress of the United States, The President of the United States, and The States of the United States.
PHASE 1: PRELIMINARY SUBMISSIONS ON HISTORICAL AND LEGAL FOUNDATIONS
β‘ PRELIMINARY DECLARATION: THE UNITED STATES OPERATES AS A ROGUE STATE
A nation that claims the benefits of international law while refusing to be bound by its obligations.
The U.S. legal system is not a system of justice. It is a system of power β designed to protect the interests of those who created it, not to uphold universal principles of right and wrong.
The “rule of law” in the United States is a myth. The real rule is:
“We make the rules. We enforce the rules. And we change the rules when they don’t serve us.”
I. INTRODUCTION
1. This Memorandum is submitted on behalf of the Plaintiffs, comprising:
- Category A: The Indigenous Nations of Turtle Island β including the Cherokee Nation, the Navajo Nation, the Lakota Nation (Sioux), the Iroquois Confederacy (Haudenosaunee), the Muscogee (Creek) Nation, the Chickasaw Nation, the Choctaw Nation, the Seminole Nation, the Apache Nations, the Pueblo Peoples, the Inuit Peoples, the Native Hawaiian Peoples, the Alaskan Native Peoples, and all other Indigenous Nations and Peoples who inhabited the lands now known as the United States prior to European contact, and who never voluntarily ceded their sovereignty to the United States of America.
- Category B: The Descendants of Enslaved Africans β the African American descendants of approximately 4 million enslaved Africans who were forcibly brought to the United States and held in bondage from 1619 to 1865, and all other descendants of enslaved Africans who were subjected to chattel slavery, legally protected by the U.S. Constitution, and who never consented to their enslavement or to the government that enforced it.
- Category C: The Descendants of Indigenous Peoples Enslaved β Native Americans who were enslaved by European settlers and survivors of forced removals, massacres, and cultural genocide.
2. The core contention of the Plaintiffs is that the legal foundation of the colonial construct known as the United States of America is fundamentally flawed and unlawful. The United States was created through a series of unilateral acts β the Doctrine of Discovery, the U.S. Constitution, and subsequent laws β imposed without the consent of Indigenous peoples or enslaved Africans. These acts were procured through force and are therefore void ab initio.
3. This Memorandum serves as Phase 1 of our submission, dedicated to establishing the historical and legal context. The Plaintiffs will demonstrate that the United States is a colonial construct with no lawful foundation in the consent of its peoples. Subsequent phases will build upon this foundation to advance the primary legal arguments, including those based on jus cogens and coercion under the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties.
II. THE DOCTRINE OF DISCOVERY WAS A RELIGIOUS FICTION, NOT A TREATY
4. The foundational legal instrument upon which the United States based its claim to Indigenous lands was not a treaty with Indigenous peoples. It was the Doctrine of Discovery β a series of unilateral religious decrees issued by the Catholic Church.
5. The Papal Bulls that established the Doctrine of Discovery include:
- Dum Diversas (1452): Authorized the enslavement of “Saracens” and “other enemies of Christ.”
- Romanus Pontifex (1455): Authorized European Christian nations to “subdue and bring to the faith” non-Christian peoples and to “take possession” of their lands.
- Inter Caetera (1493): Granted Spain the right to claim lands discovered in the Americas, declaring that “barbarous nations” could be “subjugated” and “brought to the faith.”
6. These papal bulls were not treaties. Indigenous peoples were not parties to them. They were unilateral religious decrees issued by a foreign power that had no authority over Indigenous peoples. The Doctrine of Discovery was a legal fiction invented to justify theft.
7. The U.S. Supreme Court explicitly adopted the Doctrine of Discovery in Johnson v. McIntosh (1823). Chief Justice John Marshall wrote:
“The principle of discovery gave European nations an exclusive right to extinguish the Indian title of occupancy, either by purchase or by conquest.”
8. The Doctrine of Discovery was void ab initio (void from the beginning) because:
- It was a religious fiction, not a legal instrument.
- It was never agreed to by Indigenous peoples.
- It violated the sovereignty of Indigenous nations.
- It was based on racist and genocidal assumptions.
- It is rejected by modern international law (UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples).
III. THE U.S. CONSTITUTION WAS NOT CONSENTED TO BY INDIGENOUS PEOPLES OR ENSLAVED AFRICANS
9. The U.S. Constitution β the foundational legal document of the United States β explicitly protected slavery and excluded Indigenous peoples.
10. The Constitution’s protection of slavery included:
- The Three-Fifths Compromise (Article I, Section 2, Clause 3): Counted enslaved people as 3/5 of a person for representation, giving slave states more political power.
- The Slave Trade Clause (Article I, Section 9, Clause 1): Prohibited Congress from banning the slave trade until 1808 β explicitly protecting the slave trade for 20 years.
- The Fugitive Slave Clause (Article IV, Section 2, Clause 3): Required that enslaved people who escaped to free states be returned to their enslavers β making the federal government complicit in enforcing slavery.
- Article V: Protected the slave trade clause from amendment until 1808 β making slavery a constitutionally protected institution.
11. Indigenous peoples were explicitly excluded from the Constitution. Article I, Section 2, Clause 3 states: “excluding Indians not taxed.” Indigenous peoples were not considered part of the political community.
12. Enslaved Africans were defined as property, not persons. The Constitution protected their enslavement. They never consented to the Constitution. They were never asked.
13. The Constitution was ratified by a tiny minority of the population. Only white male property owners could vote β approximately 10-15% of the total population. Indigenous peoples, enslaved Africans, women, and poor white men were excluded.
IV. INDIGENOUS PEOPLES NEVER CEDED THEIR SOVEREIGNTY
14. Prior to European contact, the lands now known as the United States were inhabited by hundreds of distinct Indigenous nations, each with their own sovereignty, governments, and legal systems.
15. Indigenous nations entered into treaties with the United States as sovereign nations. The U.S. Constitution recognizes treaties as “the supreme Law of the Land.”
16. The United States has systematically violated its treaty obligations. Over 370 treaties were signed; the vast majority were broken by the U.S. government. Examples include:
- The Treaty of Fort Laramie (1868) β promised the Black Hills to the Lakota people “forever.” The U.S. broke the treaty after gold was discovered.
- The Treaty of Hopewell (1785) β promised the Cherokee nation their land and sovereignty. The U.S. broke the treaty.
- The Treaty of New Echota (1835) β signed without the consent of the Cherokee Nation’s elected leaders; used to justify the Trail of Tears.
17. Indigenous nations were never lawfully conquered. The U.S. Supreme Court’s “domestic dependent nations” doctrine (Cherokee Nation v. Georgia, 1831) was a legal fiction invented to justify U.S. control. Indigenous nations retain their inherent sovereignty.
V. ENSLAVED AFRICANS NEVER CONSENTED TO THEIR ENSLAVEMENT
18. Between 1525 and 1866, approximately 12.5 million Africans were forcibly taken to the Americas. Approximately 597,000 were brought to what is now the United States.
19. At the start of the Civil War (1860), approximately 4 million Africans were enslaved in the United States. They constituted approximately 40% of the Southern population.
20. Enslaved Africans were legally defined as property under state and federal law. They could not vote, testify in court, marry legally, or own property. They were not citizens under the Constitution.
21. Enslaved Africans were not parties to the Constitution. They were the subjects of it. They never consented to their enslavement or to the government that enforced it.
22. The 13th Amendment (1865) abolished slavery but created a loophole for convict leasing. The exception for “punishment for crime” was exploited to create a system of forced labor that continued slavery by another name.
VI. THE LEGAL ARGUMENT: COERCION AND JUS COGENS
23. The Plaintiffs submit that the foundational instruments of the United States were procured through coercion and in violation of fundamental norms of international law.
24. Jus cogens (peremptory norms) are norms so fundamental that no treaty or law can violate them. These include:
- The prohibition on genocide
- The prohibition on slavery
- The prohibition on racial discrimination
- The prohibition on aggression
- The right to self-determination
25. The International Law Commission has confirmed that jus cogens norms have retroactive effect. They apply to historical wrongs, even if they occurred before the norms were formally recognized.
26. Under the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969), Article 52:
“A treaty is void if its conclusion has been procured by the threat or use of force in violation of the principles of international law embodied in the Charter of the United Nations.”
27. The Doctrine of Discovery was procured by force and is void. The U.S. Constitution was procured through the exclusion and enslavement of Indigenous peoples and Africans and is void to the extent it violates jus cogens.
VII. THE “STANDING” OBJECTION IS OVERRIDDEN BY INTERNATIONAL LAW
28. The United States will likely argue that the Plaintiffs lack “standing” because the wrongs are “historical” and “too remote.” This objection is overridden by international law.
29. Crimes against humanity have no statute of limitations. The Geneva Conventions and the Convention on the Non-Applicability of Statutory Limitations to War Crimes and Crimes Against Humanity (1968) state:
“No statutory limitation shall apply to the following crimes, irrespective of the date of their commission: (a) War crimes… (b) Crimes against humanity… (c) Genocide…”
30. The “continuing violation” doctrine means that the harm is ongoing. Indigenous peoples continue to be dispossessed. Descendants of enslaved Africans continue to suffer from poverty, discrimination, and mass incarceration. The injury is NOT historical β it is present and continuing.
31. Erga omnes obligations are owed to the international community as a whole. Every state has standing to enforce them. The Plaintiffs are bringing this action on behalf of humanity itself.
32. Indigenous nations are sovereign and have standing as states under international law. The United States cannot use its domestic “standing” doctrine to deny standing to sovereign nations.
33. If the United States refuses to recognize international law, it admits it is a rogue state. A state that refuses to be bound by international law forfeits its legitimacy and status as a lawful member of the international community.
VIII. THE RELIEF SOUGHT
34. The Plaintiffs respectfully request the following relief:
For Indigenous Nations:
- A declaration that the Doctrine of Discovery is void and has no legal force.
- A declaration that Indigenous nations retain their inherent sovereignty.
- The return of all lands taken without lawful consent.
- Compensation for lands that cannot be returned.
- The restoration of all treaty rights that have been violated.
- The right to self-governance, free from U.S. interference.
- Reparations for the genocide and cultural destruction of Indigenous peoples.
For Descendants of Enslaved Africans:
- A formal apology from the U.S. government for slavery and its legacy.
- Reparations for the unpaid labor of enslaved people.
- The establishment of a trust fund for African American education, housing, and economic development.
- A commission to study and recommend additional forms of restitution.
- The right to self-determination and community control over reparations funds.
For All Plaintiffs:
- A declaration that the United States was founded on genocide and slavery, and that this foundation taints all subsequent legal instruments.
- A constitutional convention to create a new founding document based on justice, consent, and equality.
- A truth and reconciliation commission to document the full extent of genocide, slavery, and continuing harm.
IX. CONCLUSION
35. The Plaintiffs submit that:
“The United States of America is a colonial construct founded on genocide, slavery, and the systematic denial of consent. Its legal foundation is fundamentally illegitimate. Indigenous nations never consented to U.S. sovereignty. Enslaved Africans never consented to their enslavement. The United States owes restitution to both.”
36. The Plaintiffs humbly pray that this Court shall:
- Declare the Doctrine of Discovery void ab initio.
- Declare that Indigenous nations retain their inherent sovereignty.
- Order the return of lands taken without consent.
- Order reparations for the descendants of enslaved Africans.
- Declare that the United States has violated jus cogens norms and erga omnes obligations.
- Establish that the Plaintiffs have standing under international law.
- Make such further orders and directions as this Honourable Court may deem fit in the circumstances.
Dated: [Insert Date]
Drawn by:
[Insert Counsel’s Name]
[Insert Counsel’s Address]
[Insert Counsel’s Contact Details]
SOURCES FOR PHASE 1
- Papal Bulls: Dum Diversas (1452), Romanus Pontifex (1455), Inter Caetera (1493) β establishing the Doctrine of Discovery.
- Johnson v. McIntosh (1823) β U.S. Supreme Court adopts the Doctrine of Discovery.
- Cherokee Nation v. Georgia (1831) β Supreme Court invents “domestic dependent nations” doctrine.
- Worcester v. Georgia (1832) β Supreme Court acknowledges Indigenous sovereignty (ignored by President Jackson).
- Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857) β Supreme Court declares enslaved people are property.
- U.S. Constitution (1787) β Explicitly protects slavery; excludes Indigenous peoples.
- 13th Amendment (1865) β Abolishes slavery with exception for “crime.”
- Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969) β Articles 52 and 53 on coercion and jus cogens.
- Convention on the Non-Applicability of Statutory Limitations to War Crimes and Crimes Against Humanity (1968) β No statute of limitations.
- UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (2007) β Rejects the Doctrine of Discovery.
- Geneva Conventions (1949) β Crimes against humanity have no statute of limitations.
- International Court of Justice, Barcelona Traction case (1970) β Establishes erga omnes obligations.
- International Law Commission β Jus cogens norms have retroactive effect.
- Bury My Heart at Wounded Knee by Dee Brown β Documents the genocide of Indigenous peoples.
- The 1619 Project by Nikole Hannah-Jones β Documents the role of slavery in American history.
- The Report of the National Museum of the American Indian β Documents the boarding school system.
- The Final Report of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada β Parallel to the U.S. experiences.
π WHO VOTED? THE NUMBERS BEHIND THE “CONSENT”
The U.S. Constitution was ratified by a tiny fraction of the population. The “consent of the governed” was a myth. Here are the numbers:
| Group | Eligible to Vote? | Percentage of Population (1790) |
|---|---|---|
| White Male Property Owners | β YES | ~10-15% of total population |
| White Male Non-Property Owners | β NO | Excluded |
| Women (All Races) | β NO | ~50% of total population |
| Enslaved Africans | β NO | ~700,000 (~18% of total) |
| Free African Americans | β MOSTLY NO | Tiny fraction |
| Indigenous Peoples (Native Americans) | β NO | ~100,000-150,000 |
π CRITICAL REALITY: WHO ACTUALLY RATIFIED THE CONSTITUTION?
The Constitution was ratified by approximately 1,200 delegates in state conventions.
- Total U.S. population (1790): ~3.9 million
- Eligible voters (white male property owners): ~400,000-500,000
- Voters who chose ratification delegates: ~100,000-150,000 (~3-4% of total population)
- Delegates who voted FOR ratification: ~1,200 men
- Percentage of population who directly consented: LESS THAN 1%
The “consent of the governed” was a myth. Over 96% of the population had no voice in the creation of the Constitution.
π RATIFICATION VOTE TOTALS BY STATE
| State | Date | For | Against | Margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Delaware | Dec 7, 1787 | 30 | 0 | Unanimous |
| Pennsylvania | Dec 12, 1787 | 46 | 23 | 2:1 |
| New Jersey | Dec 18, 1787 | 38 | 0 | Unanimous |
| Georgia | Jan 2, 1788 | 26 | 0 | Unanimous |
| Connecticut | Jan 9, 1788 | 128 | 40 | 3:1 |
| Massachusetts | Feb 6, 1788 | 187 | 168 | Very narrow |
| Maryland | Apr 28, 1788 | 63 | 11 | Strong |
| South Carolina | May 23, 1788 | 149 | 73 | 2:1 |
| New Hampshire | Jun 21, 1788 | 57 | 47 | Narrow |
| Virginia | Jun 25, 1788 | 89 | 79 | Very narrow |
| New York | Jul 26, 1788 | 30 | 27 | Extremely narrow |
| North Carolina | Aug 4, 1788 | REJECTED (initially) | ||
| Rhode Island | 1790 | REJECTED (initially, ratified by 34-32) | ||
π THE IMPLICATION: “CONSENT” WAS A MYTH
The United States was NOT founded on the consent of the governed. It was founded on:
1. The exclusion of Indigenous peoples β they were never consulted, never consented, and were systematically dispossessed.
2. The enslavement of Africans β they were legally defined as property, not persons, and never consented.
3. The exclusion of women β they were denied the vote and legal personhood under coverture.
4. The exclusion of the poor β property qualifications denied most white men the vote.
The “consent of the governed” was a slogan used to justify a system of power, not a description of how the system was created. The governed β Indigenous peoples, enslaved Africans, women, and the poor β were never asked.
βοΈ THE LEGAL SIGNIFICANCE: CONSENT IS REQUIRED FOR LEGITIMACY
Under international law, a state’s legitimacy depends on the consent of its people. The U.S. Constitution was ratified by a tiny minority of the population β and explicitly excluded those it enslaved and colonized.
Just as the 1861 Treaty of Cession in Nigeria was void because it exceeded the Oba’s authority and was procured by coercion, the U.S. Constitution is void as a contract because:
1. It was not consented to by Indigenous peoples, who had sovereignty over the land.
2. It was not consented to by enslaved Africans, who were legally defined as property.
3. It was not consented to by women, who were excluded from the political process.
4. It was not consented to by the majority of the population.
A contract that is not freely consented to by all parties is void. A constitution that excludes the majority of the people it governs is illegitimate.
β‘ THE FINAL VERDICT
The United States is a rogue state. It operates outside the international legal order. It claims the benefits of international law while refusing to be bound by its obligations.
The U.S. legal system is not a system of justice. It is a system of power β designed to protect the interests of those who created it.
The “rule of law” in the United States is a myth. The real rule is:
“We make the rules. We enforce the rules. And we change the rules when they don’t serve us.”
THE FINAL TRUTH
WHAT CAN THEY DO? THERE IS NO MONOPOLY ON LAW
THE SHORT ANSWER:
No. There is no law that says there can be only one UN or one government body in the world.
The colonizers do not have a monopoly on law. They have a monopoly on power β for now.
If they refuse to obey their own laws, if they refuse to be bound by international law, then the only logical conclusion is:
We leave. We build our own. We create our own systems of justice.
What can they do? They can try to stop us. But they cannot stop the truth. They cannot stop justice. And they cannot stop people who are determined to be free.
THE REALITY: COLONIZERS DO NOT OBEY THEIR OWN LAWS
The colonizers have created laws. They claim these laws apply to everyone. But they do not obey them.
| Colonizer | What They Did | What They Claimed |
|---|---|---|
| Britain | Signed treaties with Indigenous nations, then broke them. | “We are bringing civilization.” |
| The United States | Signed over 370 treaties with Indigenous nations, broke almost all of them. | “We are bringing freedom and democracy.” |
| France | Colonized Africa, claimed to bring “liberty, equality, fraternity.” | “We are bringing civilization.” |
| Belgium | Committed genocide in the Congo. | “We are bringing civilization.” |
| Spain | Committed genocide in the Americas. | “We are bringing Christianity.” |
THE PATTERN: Colonizers claim to be bringing law, justice, and civilization. In reality, they impose their own rules and refuse to be bound by them.
“We make the rules. We enforce the rules. And we change the rules when they don’t serve us.”
THE LOGICAL CONCLUSION: WE MUST BUILD OUR OWN
If They Will Not Obey the Law…
Then We Must Build Our Own
| Premise | Conclusion |
|---|---|
| The colonizers have created laws. | These laws are supposed to apply to everyone. |
| The colonizers do not obey the laws. | The laws have no real power. |
| The colonizers refuse to be bound by international law. | International law has no enforcement mechanism against the powerful. |
| The colonizers claim exceptionalism. | They claim to be above the law. |
| Therefore: | The law is a tool of power, not a system of justice. We must build our own. |
WHAT CAN THEY DO IF WE LEAVE AND BUILD OUR OWN?
WHAT THEY CAN DO
- Military Force: They can use military force to try to stop us.
- Economic Sanctions: They can use economic sanctions.
- Legal Action: They can use their courts to try to stop us.
- Propaganda: They can use their media to try to discredit us.
- Surveillance and Repression: They can try to surveil and repress us.
WHAT THEY CANNOT DO
- Stop the Truth: The truth is on our side. They cannot change the facts.
- Stop Justice: Justice is on our side. The moral argument is unassailable.
- Stop People Determined to Be Free: History shows oppression eventually ends.
- Claim a Monopoly on Law: There is no law that says there can be only one government.
- Claim a Monopoly on the UN: The UN is not the only possible international body.
IS THERE A LAW THAT SAYS THERE CAN BE ONLY ONE UN OR ONE GOVERNMENT?
NO.
| Question | Answer |
|---|---|
| Is there a law that says there can be only one UN? | No. The UN is a creation of states. There is no law that says it is the only possible international body. |
| Is there a law that says there can be only one government? | No. There are multiple governments in the world. There are multiple legal systems. |
| Is there a law that says we cannot form our own government? | No. The right to self-determination is recognized in international law. |
| Is there a law that says we cannot create our own legal system? | No. New legal systems are created all the time. |
THE RIGHT TO SELF-DETERMINATION
- UN Charter: “All peoples have the right to self-determination.”
- International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights: “All peoples have the right to self-determination. By virtue of that right they freely determine their political status and freely pursue their economic, social and cultural development.”
- UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples: “Indigenous peoples have the right to self-determination. By virtue of that right they freely determine their political status and freely pursue their economic, social and cultural development.”
THE RIGHT TO SELF-DETERMINATION MEANS:
- We have the right to determine our own political status.
- We have the right to form our own governments.
- We have the right to create our own legal systems.
- We have the right to leave the colonizers and build our own.
THE FINAL TRUTH
The colonizers do not have a monopoly on law. They have a monopoly on power β for now.
But power is not permanent. Empires fall. Oppression ends. Justice prevails.
If they will not obey their own laws, if they refuse to be bound by international law, then we must leave. We must build our own. We must create our own systems of justice.
What can they do? They can try to stop us. But they cannot stop the truth. They cannot stop justice. And they cannot stop people who are determined to be free.
There is no law that says there can be only one UN. There is no law that says there can be only one government. The colonizers have no monopoly on law.
We have the right to self-determination. We have the right to form our own governments. We have the right to create our own legal systems.
The only question is: Are we brave enough to do it?
THE CALL TO ACTION
1
Tell the Truth
Document the history. Share the facts.
2
Build the Movement
Connect with others who believe in justice.
3
Demand Justice
Submit the case to the IACHR and the UN.
4
Build Alternatives
Create your own institutions. Build your own governments.
5
Be Brave
The colonizers will try to stop you. Do not be afraid.
6
Win
Build a new world based on justice, consent, and equality.
“We make the rules. We enforce the rules. And we change the rules when they don’t serve us.”
β This is the rule of the colonizers. It is not the rule of law. It is the rule of power.
It is time to build a new world.
